How Obama Will Win a Second Term.

Ron Paul supporters think themselves too principled to vote for anyone else. Meanwhile Soros and the NWO types, as well as the Marxists on the left are in the shadows waiting to take our liberties away as soon as the Paul supporters hand the election over to them as I anticipate will happen. Is Ron Paul misunderstood? Let’s take a look at this question.

The Texan advocates policies which are the exact opposite of his rhetoric. If you visit his website it indicates he supports many things he actually opposes.
With Ron Paul you always have to read the fine print. His speeches before conservative audiences are often impressive, but the reality is completely different. Some examples are:

  • Paul is a registered Republican but expresses considerable disdain for the GOP. He says there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats. In 1987 the Congressman said “I want to completely disassociate myself from Ronald Reagan,” and described his administration as a “dramatic failure.”
    He accused George H.W. Bush of war crimes, and wanted to impeach George W. Bush because of the non-existent North American Union. He says Gov. Rick Perry (R-TX) is part of the “international conspiracy” and endorsed his primary opponent. Paul refused to endorse Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) in 2008, and was the only Republican to express approval when Democrats captured control of the House and Senate in 2006. If Paul is not nominated, he refuses to pledge support for the 2012 GOP presidential candidate.
All this dissension does is foster contempt for the GOP by his followers, and anyone listening within the sound of his voice. I would argue that Ron Paul is doing more harm than good to the Republican party by running as a republican. Imagine a prominent democrat figure such as Hillary Clinton or Harry Reid running as a Republican but then saying every nasty thing they could about the republican party. Then coloring their speeches with words of righteous indignation. Soon their supporters start to believe they are the only right kind of republican, everyone else is a neoconservative (neocon) or stupid, or uninformed. Then imagine scores of crowds especially disaffected young people, and TeaParty types who are discouraged by the lack of fiscal restraint and decisive action by their party flocking to the NEW right republican the only true conservative. Then imagine support coming in from the left, and the Democrats with who this new message resonates and money flowing from the powerful Soros crowd who now see an opportunity to disrupt the Republican field and confuse the independents into believing “this guy knows my plight.”  Soon infighting, confusion, and arguments ensue among the party faithful and  ”independents” who have taken on the title of Libertarian and are now furious at the GOP. Sound crazy? I have just described what I see going on right now in America among the conservatives, Republicans, and Independents who would vote Republican. We are split and they are winning. I now see clearly how Obama will get a second term
If you want to discuss my opinions or give me yours you may find me on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rosie-Onthe-Right/184115634955854
for source concerning Soros funding Ron Paul campaign to split the republican party click here

 

Ron Paul Here to Stay.

Ron Paul narrowly lost the Iowa straw poll last week to Michele Bachmann by a few hundred votes.  He spent a fraction that Bachmann spent on advertising and campaigning throughout Iowa.  You would never know that seeing as how many in the media are already writing him off as an illegitimate candidate.  Like Rodney Dangerfield, Mr. Paul doesn’t get any respect, despite being immensely popular and performing well in the Iowa straw poll and the CPAC straw poll two years in a row.  Despite developing a solid foundation of support, which has grown consistently stronger over the last few years, few in the media are taking his campaign seriously.  Like it or not, Ron Paul is proving that he is here to stay and will be a solid fixture in the race for the GOP nomination.

The basis for Ron Paul’s appeal is his message, which is unique and consistent, something few other politicians can say.  It doesn’t matter if Paul is on MSNBC or Fox News; it doesn’t matter if you’re Democrat or Republican, Ron Paul never flip-flops and doesn’t sugar coat his message to appease the masses.  Paul often found himself at odds with his own party over several issues such as the war in Iraq and spending.  (FYI Mr. Paul was against the Iraq war from the start and voted against it, something many Democrats who ran against the war a few years ago can’t say such as Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and John Kerry.)  Paul has also spoken out and voted against military aid to nations such as Egypt, Israel, and Pakistan.  Along with that, he has long been an advocate of closing military bases throughout the world and bringing all our troops home to save money, an idea that once was unthinkable, but is now plausible.

Another reason Ron Paul is so appealing is his foresight, because if you look at his record, he has been sounding the alarm about our dangerous level of spending for over a decade.  Throughout the years, Paul has put his money where his mouth is on spending, voicing his support for a balanced budget amendment as far back as 2000.  He voted against the bogus bailout packages that GM and Chrysler got that will end up costing the tax payers billions of dollars when all is said and done.  Paul is a strong conservative who has a strong record of fighting for less government and more personal freedoms.

The mainstream media can try to ignore Ron Paul all they want, but he isn’t going anywhere anytime fast.  Even if he doesn’t get the GOP nod, he will be a strong candidate for the presidency even if he has to run as an independent.  I’m not saying that Ron Paul is going to be the next president; what I am saying is that Ron Paul is a serious contender and is here to stay, whether those in the media like it or not.    By: Tom O’Brien

 

My take: Thank you Tom O’Brien for that eloquent reminder that Ron Paul is here to stay. What is not covered in this piece is the facts about Paul’s refusal to name Shari’a a threat to the United States Constitution. Shari’a Law is the theo-political arm of Islam. Without it Islam ceases to be Islam. You can’t have one without the other. For those who don’t know what Shari’a Law is, it is according to Islamic followers the laws that govern the Islamic people. It is above man’s laws. Many Imams have publicly said the goal of Shari’a Law in America is to over come the U.S Constitution in the United States. If you don’t think it can happen just look at the UK. Everything that is happening in London, France, Norway, the Netherlands… and now it’s coming here too.  I need a president who sees that impending danger as well as all the other dangers. Islamist claim since it is above man’s made laws it is superior and that no Muslim will follow the U.S Constitution above Shari’a Law. Shari’a Law is what is practiced in Iran. You know the cutting off of hands when you are caught stealing, the stoning of women who are raped because it is her responsibility to cover her whole body since the male species has no control over his body, the honor killings…laws like that. I don’t know about you but Ron Paul does well to take a second look at that. If he is the Constitutionalist he says he is he should see the threat,, but he does not. He has famously said “we are not at war with Islam” Mr. Paul we may not be at war with Islam but they are at war with us; to ignore their own words is to ignore that fact, and to ignore that fact is to revert back to the policies in place on Sept 11,2001 when we were attacked by Saudi men on behalf of Allah. BY their own admission they did it for Allah and for the sake of Islam. On Aug 16,2011 while on Ron Paul on Fox News Ron Paul said if Iran got a nuke and fired it on Israel “the United States should do nothing.” That’s right. According to Ron Paul the U.S should do nothing to support our only ally in the Middle East. If Israel is gone that would mean the U.S would cease to have a friend in that region. If you think gas is expensive now wait until a President Ron Paul is in office. That is not even good economic sense. It is really too bad because I like Ron Paul on so many issues; for example his position on the border is right. His position on auditing the Fed is spot on, on debt, on even the war in Iraq was right. He had the foresight to see what many would not or could not see, but on this one issue he is so wrong . I can not defend his position, and I can not support him for president in 2012. 

Ron Paul Within Days of 2012 Presidential Bid Announcement

Texas Congressman Ron Paul could be set to officially announce whether or not he is running for the Republican 2012 nomination this week with a series of back to back high profile media appearances.

The Libertarian favorite is scheduled to appear today on The View, Hannity, and The Colbert Report. Officially these appearances are to promote Paul’s new book, Liberty Defined, yet they could serve as a platform for the announcement the Congressman’s supporters have been awaiting with baited breath for months.

The first meaningful 2012 debate is set for May 5th, a week Thursday, as Fox News and the Republican Party of South Carolina host a debate among Republican candidates at the Peace Center in Greenville, S.C.

In order to be included in the debate, candidates must meet certain criteria by April 29th.

Eligibility requirements include registering a presidential exploratory committee or presidential campaign with the Federal Election Commission; filing paperwork to be on the ballot for president in South Carolina; paying a $25,000 filing fee to the state Republican Party; and averaging 1 percent in the five most recent national polls.

In comments to the Spartanburg Herald Journal last week, Ron Paul’s campaign manager Jesse Benton said that the Congressman will meet the criteria and will participate in the debate. Indeed, the Congressman has begun setting up a presidential exploratory committee, to “test the waters” for a formal run.

“…as a final decision draws closer, his team has put the pieces in place for him to flip a switch and hit the ground running if he decides to run for president.” Benton told Politico.

Benton also said that Paul would base a decision to run in 2012 in part on the response he receives at the May 5 debate.

The latest reports indicate that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Governor from Minnesota Tim Pawlenty, former Louisiana governor Buddy Roemer, and former US Senator Rick Santorum will also be participating in the debate.

Gary Franchi reports on the Congressman’s likely 2012 run:

 

Following the Fox News debate, the next scheduled event is a CNN sponsored debate in New Hampshire on June 7th.

Meanwhile Ron Paul’s Liberty Defined reached a high of number nine on Amazon.com’s bestsellers chart last week. Now at number 26 overall, the book is still currently the top selling political publication with the online giant.

If you want to help push Ron Paul’s Liberty Defined back into the top ten and help support the Congressman’s imminent Presidential run! Buy the book here.

Source

Editorial by Rosie Onthe Right

click here for Rosie On the Right facebook page